Not that he or anyone remotely close to him will read this obscure web-log post, but I wanted my first post since going into the “hibernation” of finals season to be in honor of the Honorable David Paterson, governor of New York. Recently, SNL did a sketch with Paterson as its subject. I was busy frantically writing a seminar paper last Saturday and missed the show’s live airing, but caught it on youtube more recently. Admittedly, parts of the sketch are quite funny, particularly the parts where their portrayal of Paterson “craps on New Jersey.”
However, the sketch was quite upsetting in their caricature of this articulate, politically savvy leader as a bumbling idiot, merely because he happens to be blind. Typically, SNL is funny in its mockery of politicians because it picks up on personality quirks and contextual absurdity to poke fun at them. For example, Will Ferrell’s famous southern drawl, silly smirk, and ill-imagined SAT words made “strategery” a favorite of my generation. More recently, Tina Fey’s spot on impersonation of Sarah Palin in several opening sketches, with her winking, apparent ignorance public policy, and outright annoying “folksy” demeanor surely had a much bigger influence on people’s political sensibilities than a short spot on Weekend Update, after the show is half over.

Governor David Paterson of New York
So, why would Palin and others keep silent, while Paterson risks the appearance of being an oversensitive, bitter blow hard? The answer is simple, this SNL was not about Governor David Paterson, it was about disability. The sketch does not pick up on any personality quirk of Paterson’s as an individual, but stereotypes him as a blind man. Holding charts upside down, wandering about in front of the camera, and generally appearing confused, these jokes were not about Paterson but about blindness. It is as egregious as if SNL decided to mock Barack Obama, not for being a media darling, as they did, but for being a black man, complete with those stereotypes. I am not trying to engage in the “oppression olympics” here, but mean to point out that this sketch spent a good deal of time mocking a stereotype of disability, not a particular political figure.
Paterson’s response was simply heroic. It is unquestionable that speaking out against the SNL sketch was against his political interest. The associated press reports that Lee Miringoff, an expert pollster that gauges public reaction to politicians, said that the reaction against the skit was “unwise” and explained “I can’t recall the last time a politician has reacted negatively to being lampooned on ‘Saturday Night Live,’ . . . It humanizes them. At least your name is on the marquee.” What this Miringoff doesn’t get is that Paterson was not trying to react in a way that would serve his political interests. What is “unwise” politically can be straight-up valiant when you look beyond the narrow political picture. For once, a politician was not thinking just of himself, but of his community.
Governor Paterson took a strong stance in support of the disability community, showing his moral medal as far as I am concerned:
“Now that [Alaska Gov. Sarah] Palin’s not around, they seem to have run out of material . . . The idea of a person rolling around the stage in a chair, being disoriented, can’t find anything, bumbling, in a sense looking like a clown is a way disabled people are portrayed all the time. . . . The perception that disability equals inability to be responsible is totally wrong . . . There is only one way that people could have an unemployment rate that’s six times the national average — it’s attitude . . . And I’m afraid that the kind of third-grade depiction of individuals and the way they look and the way they move add to that negative environment . . . I don’t mind that they make fun of me, but I thought it was important to speak up for those who don’t have a voice and don’t have a job.”
These, my friends, are the words of a true hero of Crip Town. He is not merely a politician who happens to have a disability. He is one of us.
Thank you David.







December 18th, 2008 at 9:39 am
so glad you made time out to write this. i was too angry to say anything coherently, this is really good.
December 19th, 2008 at 12:56 am
I gotta admit, I liked Fred Armisen’s impersonation, but the blindness jokes were so cheap. It was discouraging because so much more of the impression was really observant. Paterson’s hammy jokes, salt-and-pepper beard, grating voice, love for admitting wrong-doings… He had it down. I’m glad to see the boss man sticking up for himself.
December 19th, 2008 at 6:46 pm
thanks Joe. Good Post. I loved Patterson’s response because to me he was not only speaking on behalf of people who are blind, he was providing talking points for people with all types of disabilities who have been the subject of this type of humor.
December 20th, 2008 at 3:09 am
Exactly. Everything was funny EXCEPT the blind jokes. I’m not sure if they just couldn’t figure out how to do the sketch without them, or what… Of course, I thought the Lawrence Welk sketch with the sisters singing group was out of line, too, with the fourth sister basically being developmentally disabled as the only joke line to the sketch. SNL can be fantastically funny sometimes, but that was just dumb…